Can a Catholic Wife Pursue Breast Augmentation in Marriage?

A Catholic look at the morality of breast augmentation, weighing intention, medical need, beauty, marriage, modesty, and chastity through the lens of Catholic moral theology.

---

Breast augmentation is a morally sensitive question for Catholics because it touches on the dignity of the body, the meaning of feminine beauty, modesty, marriage, and the proper place of sexual attraction. Since Catholic moral theology does not evaluate cosmetic procedures only by the procedure itself, but also by intention, circumstances, and proportionality, this topic requires more nuance than a simple yes or no answer. In this article, we’ll examine the morality of breast augmentation through several possible motivations, including restorative medical reasons, cosmetic desires, marital intimacy, and the danger of seeking sexual attention outside the proper bounds of chastity.

Now before morally analyzing the procedure itself, some may right away object that in order for this procedure to be done, the surgeon involved would be placing himself in an occasion of sin. However, the Church has long understood that those in the medical profession, such as, for example, OBGYNs, are exempted from this admonition. Furthermore, a surgeon can operate this procedure for a number of reasons unrelated to purely cosmetic considerations, so even if purely cosmetic motivations were immoral, it wouldn’t preclude a cosmetic surgeon from licitly accomplishing this procedure in general. With that objection out of the way, let’s analyze the morality of breast augmentation surgery by looking at a few different reasons a woman might posit in pursuing it. 

Medicinal/restorative reasons: If a woman suffers a physical injury which results in the damage or disfigurement of her breasts, the Church would have absolutely no moral qualms with her pursuing surgery that would restore them to their natural appearance. This, I think, can be done without any sin or even imperfection. 

Purely cosmetic reasons: While the procedure itself does not violate the order of nature and is therefore not intrinsically evil, to undergo a procedure like this from a moral standpoint would certainly require a proportionately serious reason to justify such an alteration of the body’s natural appearance. Since the breasts are a sexual part of the body and are therefore relational in nature, I do not think the mere desire a woman might have for them to “look better” would rise to the level of a proportionately serious reason. 

For pleasing one’s husband: This is where the matter can become quite nuanced. On the one hand, traditional theologians and even St. Thomas Aquinas, drawing from Paul’s letter (1 Corinthians 7), all affirm that women are able to adorn themselves or accentuate feminine features in a way that elicits greater pleasure. Since God designed female breasts not only so that a woman can nurse children but also so that she can attract and allure her husband (Proverbs 5:19), if a woman by natural happenstance lacks those features of breasts that are characteristic to what naturally and ordinarily elicits pleasure in men, then there is nothing from a moral point of view that would prevent her from seeking out a procedure that would, in her mind, “restore” the breasts to a state that would better fulfill this natural purpose. This being said, just because the procedure might not be always and everywhere sinful, spouses should take great caution when considering this. The husband must never request a procedure like this as any kind of precondition for his spousal affection or even sexual love. He should also never pressure her into a procedure like this. Only if both husband and wife after careful discernment sincerely believe that this would lead to  a more mutually enriching sexual relationship would pursuing a procedure like this be free from sin or perhaps even imperfection.

In order to appear attractive to others: This would not only be a sinful motivation to pursue breast cosmetic surgery, but a gravely sinful motivation. The only non-medicinal motivation for a procedure like this that could be free from sin would be for the sake of bettering conjugal love exchanged between husband and wife. Therefore, a wife’s husband is the only person for whom she can pursue this procedure if the motivation has anything to do with sexual attraction. 

In short, while the Church would in the vast majority of non-medicinal cases caution against this and would see it as a gateway to objectification or in inordinate preoccupation with sexual pleasure in marriage, I would argue there can be instances where it would not constitute an offense against God.